Close this window

Subscription Information



March 28, 2005School Health Programs Department
The New Look of School Safety [Part 2 of 2]
Find out what works
Schools have several challenges to overcome when addressing safety and security. Developing a ready source of expertise is at the top. Many schools are still fumbling in the dark as they search for appropriate programs and strategies.

“Thus,” says a 2002 report from the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, “we are left with basing such decisions upon practices that appear promising, relying on our experience and using our best judgment, until the knowledge base on school safety becomes more solid, cohesive, and evidence-based.”

A Department of Education study puts it this way: “Many violence prevention and conflict resolution/peer mediation curricula exist in schools. A limited number of these have been evaluated because of the extensive costs and the evaluative skills necessary to determine directly related outcomes.”

New security technology is emerging constantly, but all too often, experts say, schools buy equipment that does not deliver on its promises or is too difficult to maintain.

In 1995, Sandia Labs, a federal Department of Energy research facility in New Mexico, determined that some of its technology and security expertise could help schools. For the past 10 years, Sandia’s project has been run by Mary Green, who possesses a rare resume: She is a security specialist with an education degree.

With Sandia, Green has visited more than 200 schools and school districts and piloted dozens of safety programs and technologies. Sandia has produced a manual for schools to assist them in the proper use of security technology, and Green emphasizes that not all security issues demand elaborate, high-tech solutions.

Green believes in security cameras -- they are cheaper than ever, she says -- but believes metal detectors are appropriate in only 2 to 5 percent of schools, because they are so manpower intensive. She has also studied biometric devices, which allow access based on fingerprint, handprint, or iris identification, but says their use in schools is stymied by the same problem: They also require too many people to operate.

Identification badges can help school safety efforts, but motivating students and staff to wear them can be difficult. Some also see security technology as an intrusion on their personal rights; a bus drivers’ union in Boston, for example, recently objected to having global positioning devices installed on school buses.

The people factor
Indeed, technology isn’t always the answer. In one instance, Green worked with a New Mexico school that had a well-defined problem: Gangs were regularly staging ugly battles on the playground. Her low-tech solution: Build a fence.

“They did not like that idea,” Green says. “But after we put in a small mesh fence, which you could not climb, their problem ended. People could still get into the playground, but the fence just made it a lot less convenient for gangs to go at each other there.”

Many other school districts are also focusing on decidedly low-tech approaches. When the Carroll County, Md., school board revised its policy of dealing with unruly students this past fall, the point was to sharpen definitions and consider some back-to-basics approaches to avoid having to use physical restraint.

“We first try to de-escalate the situation,” Cynthia Little, the district’s director of student services, told the Baltimore Sun. “Something as simple as taking a kid around the building can help. All those [less-restrictive] measures happen before we’d ever dream of doing exclusion, seclusion, or physical restraint.”

Leadership is the key to successful implementation, Sandia’s Green stresses, noting that few school board members recognize how many security and safety challenges their principals face every day. “The people aspect is by far the biggest component,” she says. “The right people need to take ownership and see that these projects are successful.”

Better data, better decisions
The right information is crucial as well. For schools to truly learn from one another, safety and incident data must be uniform and easily understood. A number of states have stepped up data requirements for schools, aiming toward better decisions based on better information.

In 1999, Virginia’s state legislature required every school to complete a written emergency and crisis management plan and to conduct a written assessment of its safety conditions. That same year, the state established a program that provides matching grants to law enforcement agencies and school boards that support uniformed school resource officers in middle and high schools. Then, in 2000, the legislature established the Virginia Center for School Safety.

Some 30 other states have established similar centers. One difference in Virginia, though, is where the center stands in the state’s organizational hierarchy -- that is, in the state department of criminal justice.

“Last time I went to a meeting of people from 26 states who had done this, I was the only one from a department of criminal justice,” says Donna Bowman, the center’s director.

Bowman says the center’s mandate is to provide resources, training, and data collection to local school districts as well as to disseminate best practices in school safety. Because schools in her state must conduct audits of their safety efforts, Bowman says the center is pushing for uniformity in that reporting. Once that occurs, data can easily be compared and studied and districts can effectively learn from one another, she says.

“Putting something like this in a department of justice is saying, ‘This is a priority, and we want a community response,’” says Bowman. Because after all, as she puts it, “School safety is part of public safety.”

Speak Up for Kids Day!
7th Annual SPEAK UP FOR KIDS DAY!

¡Celebra el Día de Cesar Chavez! ¡Hable en favor de niños!

THURSDAY, MARCH 31st
San Francisco City Hall
Polk St, between McAllister & Grove, at CIVIC CENTER

Tell City Hall What the Children, Youth & Families in Your Community Need!

Schedule:
9-10AM RALLY TO STOP CUTS TO CHILDRENS AND YOUTH SERVICES!
10-1PM ADVOCACY MTGS WITH MEMBERS OF THE BD. OF SUPERVISORS

WHAT HAPPENS AT SPEAK UP?

- Bring youth or parents from your neighborhood or organization to educate the Supes on community priorities and ideas for the budget. Tell them your ideas about the solutions to your community's problems!
- 10 of 11 Supervisors are participating this year!
- Every community group can meet with a max of 3 Supervisors; meetings are 20 minutes each.
- Over the years, youth and parents at Speak Up for Kids Day! have saved funding for many programs, won afterschool youth workers, won funding for a neighborhood van collaborative, and educated Supervisors on the importance of raising wages for child care workers!

CALL COLEMAN ADVOCATES at 239-0161 today to:
___ PRE-REGISTER YOUR GROUP FOR MEETINGS WITH THE SUPES
___VOLUNTEER TO BE A CHILDRENS BUDGET LEADER IN YOUR DISTRICT OR HELP THE DAY OF THE EVENT!

NEW THIS YEAR:

FREE FOOD ROOM! FREE YOUTH FILM SCREENINGS! ON-SITE TRAINING ON MEETING WITH CITY OFFICIALS!

Math Emerges as Big Hurdle for Teenagers
Researchers from the United Negro College Fund went to West Virginia last year and asked 62 high school dropouts in the federal Job Corps program a simple, open-ended question. “What was it about school,” they wanted to know, “that caused you to quit?”

With surprising consistency, a majority of the participants, most of whom were African-American or Hispanic, gave the same answer: “Math.”

Though the results are not scientific, they point to a challenge that confronts policymakers and educators as they campaign to make American high schools more academically rigorous. Experts agree that if the goal is for all students to graduate from high school ready for college or other postsecondary study, schools have their work cut out for them, at least in mathematics.

The challenge may be particularly daunting, these experts add, when it comes to the kinds of students drawn to training programs like the Job Corps—students who are members of minority groups or those who fall at the lower end of the academic-achievement scale. Yet, they note, the emphasis at the federal level so far has primarily been on improving reading.

“I think, fundamentally, we’re going to find math is more critical than we might have thought it was,” said M. Christopher Brown II, the director of social justice and professional development for the American Educational Research Association, based in Washington. Mr. Brown spearheaded the not-yet-published West Virginia study when he was the director of the United Negro College Fund’s Frederick D. Patterson Research Institute in Fairfax, Va.

Architects of the push for transforming high schools don’t disagree that the task they face is particularly great in math. But, they add, it’s not a reason to hold back on efforts to ratchet up academic content in high school math classes.

“The problem is this: We have lots of kids coming into high schools who are not yet ready to take rigorous math coursework,” said Michael Cohen, the president of the Washington-based nonprofit group Achieve. Along with President Bush and the nation’s governors, Achieve is calling for improving high schools.

“At the same time,” Mr. Cohen added, “we have to give the kids who are still in high school better than they have now. We just can’t afford to wait until better-prepared students come through the pipeline.”

In the study conducted by the United Negro College Fund, dropouts in the Job Corps who ranged in age from 16 to their mid-20s cited a variety of reasons for their lack of success with high school math. They talked about getting “pushed along” in school despite not having mastered the subject, having poor-quality textbooks, feeling bored, and being taught math by athletic coaches or by teachers whom they considered not “smart.”

Passing Along
“They basically pass students along,” agreed Crystal Collett, 18, a student at Kansas City Community College in Kansas City, Kan. Although she was not part of the West Virginia study, she found herself taking remedial math upon entering community college.

“In high school, my algebra teacher would give us an assignment and tell us to do the homework,” Ms. Collett recalled in a telephone interview. “The next day, she would give answers on the overhead. I never understood how she did it, and she didn’t show us.”

National statistics bear out observations that high school math is a struggle for many students—not just those who are low-achieving or disadvantaged in some way.

On the 2000 National Assessment of Educational Progress test in math, 17 percent of high school seniors scored at the “proficient” level—just under half the percentage scoring at that level on the NAEP reading test. Twenty-two percent of college freshmen, like Ms. Collett, are identified as needing remedial math, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.

But the climb to college-level math could be hardest on minority students, many of whom attend schools with fewer resources, less experienced teachers, and more teachers teaching subjects for which they were not trained. Many African-American students are disproportionately assigned to lower-level math classes in high school, sometimes even when they have the grades to do better.

On 12th grade NAEP math tests given in 2000, black and white students were separated by a gap of 34 scale-score points—about the same as in 1990. (Among younger students, mathematics differences on NAEP tests narrowed slightly between black and white students over roughly the same period.)

“It doesn’t matter whether they’re male or female, African-American students do tend to experience mathematics in school in a qualitatively different way than other folks,” said Danny Bernard Martin, an associate professor of mathematics education at the University of Illinois-Chicago.

The “algebra for all” movement begun in the 1990s is a case in point, he said. Prompted by studies showing that algebra was a “gatekeeper” course that paved the way for students to take higher-level math and go on to college, many districts began requiring students to take a first-level algebra course by 8th or 9th grade.

“But ‘algebra’ is not algebra in every location,” Mr. Martin said, noting that many pupils got watered-down versions of the subject. “For many students of color, they may have taken the math requested, and then tried to enter college and tried to enter the workforce and found out they were not prepared.”

“If the country’s serious about this on the mathematics side,” said Robert P. Moses, the civil rights leader who founded the Cambridge, Mass.-based Algebra Project, “it will have to do something very different than it’s doing now.”

What It Takes
Experts agree that, at a minimum, the United States will have to improve preparation for math teachers at all levels if all students are to be held accountable for reaching higher levels of achievement.

Research is less definitive on what makes for good math instruction at the high school level, particularly for lower-achieving students. Indeed, federal education officials say, the reason the Bush administration has emphasized reading instruction up until now is that research in that subject is further along than studies on math instruction.

The enduring “math wars” are evidence that math educators and mathematicians remain divided, even in their own communities, on the proper focus of math study and how it should be taught.

But the wrong way to go about improving minority students’ math achievement, according to Mr. Moses, is to expand federal testing requirements in high school, as President Bush has proposed for schools taking part in the federal Title I program for disadvantaged students.

Mr. Moses’ fear is that preparing students for such tests leaves little time for them to delve into the deeper concepts that can engage them intellectually.

That view is not shared by all groups working toward educational equity. The Washington-based Education Trust, for one, supports the heavy emphasis on testing embedded in the federal No Child Left Behind Act—in part because it holds schools accountable for raising the test scores of specific subgroups of children, such as African-Americans and Hispanics.

In a report released last fall, the research and advocacy group credited the 3-year-old law with having narrowed math achievement gaps between elementary students in 17 of the 21 states for which its researchers could collect data. ("Report: States See Test-Score Gains," Oct. 20, 2004.)

Mr. Moses’ own efforts to improve math education through the Algebra Project have been unusually intense.

At Lanier High School in Jackson, Miss., a predominantly black, mostly poor school with which Mr. Moses works, students who take part in his program have to agree to take 90 minutes of math instruction five days a week, which is the equivalent of two math courses a year.

Teachers in the project, most of whom follow the same group of students through high school, have common planning periods and teach no more than 70 students a day. The result so far, Mr. Moses said, is that he now has 46 juniors and seniors who have stuck with the program, some of them since 8th grade, and most of whom, he hopes, will be able to enter college without taking remedial math.

But Mr. Moses and the University of Illinois’ Mr. Martin say that educators also will have to address cultural issues as they try to nudge more minority students into higher-level math courses. Researcher Jacqueline Leonard of Temple University in Philadelphia, for example, integrates math lessons into church Sunday school classes in her community.

“Some of it has to do with the expectations students have about who is supposed to do well in math,” Mr. Martin said.

Mr. Moses deploys “math-literacy workers”—college-age students who were once students in the Algebra Project—as role models in middle and high schools.

“What they could do that I couldn’t do is make it cool to do math,” Mr. Moses said.

Wellness Center
Congratulations to all the participants of the Brotherhood Sisterhood assembly for another fantastic show. A special congratulations and thanks to the Youth Outreach Workers for a highly entertaining presentation on healthy relationships, the Gay Straight Alliance for effectively bringing up the issue of homophobia and plugging the Day of Silence, and the Hip Hop Club for integrating school staff in this year's performance.

Christy Parsons (Wellness Coordinator) is available daily.

Ian Enriquez (Youth Outreach Coordinator) is available daily.

Sheening Lin (psychologist) is available daily.

Emi Koga (Japanese speaking counselor) is available from Tuesday to Thursday.

David Thompson (psychologist) is available Mondays.

Kory Okun (relationship counselor) is available Tuesdays.

Wayne Hayes (counselor) is available Tuesdays.

James Guay (therapist) is available Wednesdays.

Zhanna Goldfine (Russian speaking counselor) is available Wednesdays.

Rebecca Peng (Mandarin speaking counselor) is available Tuesdays and Fridays.

Jane Steiner (Tobacco Intervention Coordinator) is available on Tuesday. Lincoln no longer has a school nurse.

Derek So and Pauline Ong (Cantonese speaking counselors) are available on Wednesday and Thursday.

Peer Tutoring available 7th period and after school in Bungalow A.

Presidential Freedom Scholarship
The Presidential Freedom Scholarships are available again this year. This program, administered by Learn and Serve America at the Corporation for National and Community Service, provides Presidential recognition and a $1,000 college scholarship to high school juniors and seniors for their leadership in community service. The Corporation provides $500 which must be matched with at least $500 secured by the high school from the community. Students must complete at least 100 hours of community service to be eligible for the scholarship.

This year the Corporation is offering up to 7,800 scholarships. The early notification deadline is April 1, 2005, and the final postmark deadline is July 1, 2005.

Click on the Presidential Freedom Scholarships program for more information.

If you have any questions, contact:

Dina Paxenos
Program Manager
Presidential Freedom Scholarships
1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20036
202-742-5324

On-line Resources
  

  Click to receive personal email editions of the Lincoln Wellness Center Newsletter